References
1. FAO. How to Feed the World in 2050. URL: http://www.fao.org/
2. United Nations, 2017. World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion in 2100. URL: https://population.un.org/wpp/
3. ISAAA. 2017. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2017: Biotech Crop Adoption Surges as Economic Benefits Accumulate in 22 Years. In: ISAAA Brief No. 53. Ithaka, N.Y.: ISAAA, 2017. 143 p.
4. Tutelyan V.A. (ed.). Genetically Modified Food Sources: Safety Assessment and Control. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo RAMN, 2007: 444 p. (in Russian)
5. Genetically Modified Food Sources. Safety Assessment and Control. Edited by V.A. Tutelyan. San Diego: Elsevier; Academic Press, 2013: 338 p.
6. Pokrovskiy A.A. (ed.). Biological and medical research on hydrocarbon yeast (1964–1970). Moscow: Nauka. 1972: 468 p. (in Russian)
7. Pokrovskiy A.A. Metabolic aspects of food pharmacology and toxicology. Moscow: Meditsina, 1979: 184 p. (in Russian)
8. Kravchenko L.V., Kuz’mina E.Ye., Avren’eva L.I., Pozdnyakov A.L., Kulakova S.N., Levachev M.M. Influence of fish oil oxidation level on the xenobiotics metabolism enzymes functional state. Voprosy pitaniia [Problems of Nutrition]. 1994; (4): 13–6. (in Russian)
9. Tyshko N.V., Sadykova E.O. Genetically modified food products: development of safety assessment system in Russia. Health Risk Analysis. 2018; 4: 119–26.
10. Tyshko N.V. Control over genetically modified organisms of plant origin in food products: scientific justification and methodological support. Voprosy pitaniia [Problems of Nutrition]. 2017; 86 (5): 29–33. (in Russian)
11. Tyshko N.V., Zhminchenko V.M., Selyaskin K.E., Pashorina V.A., Utembaeva N.T., Tutelyan V.A. Assessment of the impact of genetically modified LibertyLink® maize on reproductive function and progeny development of Wistar rats in three generations. Toxicol Rep. 2014; 1: 330–40.
12. Tsatsakis A.M., Nawaz M.A., Tutelyan V.A., Golokhvast K.S., Kalantzi O.I., Chung D.H., et al. Impact on environment, ecosystem, diversity and health from culturing and using GMOs as feed and food. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017; 107: 108–21.
13. Tyshko N.V., Shestakova S.I. Model of vitamin and mineral deficiency for toxicological research: apoptosis activity under conditions of CCL4 intoxication. Toxicol Rep. 2019; 6: 151–4.
14. Sedeek K.E.M., Mahas A., Mahfouz M. Plant genome engineering for targeted improvement of crop traits. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00114
15. Nowicka B., Ciura J., Szymańska R., Kruk J. Improving photosynthesis, plant productivity and abiotic stress tolerance – current trends and future perspectives. J Plant Physiol. 2018; 231: 415–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.10.022
16. Tutelyan V.A., Tyshko N.V., Sadykova E.O. Food derived from genetically modified animals: formation of safety assessment system and new approaches to toxicological research. Toxicol Lett. 2019; 314 (1): 241–2.
17. van Huis A., Van Itterbeeck J., Klunder H., Mertens E., Halloran A., Muir G., et al. Edible insects. Future prospects for food and feed security. In: FAO Forestry Paper 171. Rome, 2013.
18. Collins C.M., Vaskou P., Kountouris Y. Insect food products in the western world: assessing the potential of a new «green» market. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2019; 112 (6): 518–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saz015
19. Makkar H. Review. Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change. Animal. 2018; 12 (8): 1744–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700324X
20. Rumpold B.A., Schlüter O.K. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013; 57 (5): 802–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201200735
21. Kim S.W., Less J.F., Wang L., Yan T., Kiron V., Kaushik S.J., et al. Meeting global feed protein demand: challenge, opportunity, and strategy. Ann Rev Animal Biosci. 2019; 7: 221–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014838
22. van der Spiegel M., Noordam M., van der Fels‐Klerx H. Safety of novel protein sources (insects, microalgae, seaweed, duckweed, and rapeseed) and legislative aspects for their application in food and feed production. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2013; 12: 662–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12032
23. Belluco S., Losasso C., Maggioletti M., Alonzi C.C., Paoletti M.G., et al. Edible insects in a food safety and nutritional perspective: a critical review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2013; 12: 296–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12014
24. Garino C., Zagon J., Braeuning A. Insects in food and feed – allergenicity risk assessment and analytical detection. EFSA J. 2019; 17 (S2): e170907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170907
25. Administrative guidance on the submission of applications for authorization of a novel food pursuant to Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA Support. Publ. 2018; 2018: EN-1381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.EN-1381
26. Brodmann T., Endo A., Gueimonde M., Vinderola G., Kneifel W., de Vos W.M., et al. Safety of novel microbes for human consumption: practical examples of assessment in the European Union. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8: 1725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01725
27. SHC F. Food safety aspects of insects intended for human consumption (Sci Com dossier 2014/04; SHC dossier no 9160). The FASFC’s Scientific Committee and the Committee of the Superior Health Council (SHC). 2014.
28. Mancini S., Sogari G., Menozzi D., Nuvoloni R., Torracca B., Moruzzo R., et al. Factors predicting the intention of eating an insect-based product. Foods. 2019; 8: 270.